Difference between revisions of "Goals and success criteria"

From DE4A
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
== 2.2 Pilot dimensions ==
 
== 2.2 Pilot dimensions ==
 +
''Qualitative description on lessons learned (technical, functional, proess, data, usability etc) and preliminary conclusions on these dimensions, based on metrics, questiuonnaires and interviews? The dimensions target the scope of the piloted functionality and patterns (until delivery of the report)''
  
 
=== 2.2.1 Use ===
 
=== 2.2.1 Use ===
Line 31: Line 32:
  
 
== 2.3 Technical common criteria (questionnaire for evaluation?) ==
 
== 2.3 Technical common criteria (questionnaire for evaluation?) ==
''[Explanation (in written) on how success criteria /metrics are related with Technical common criteria, distributed by pilot dimensions]''
+
''[Qualitative description of preliminary conclusion per criterium. Explanation (in written) on how success criteria /metrics are related with Technical common criteria, distributed by pilot dimensions]''
  
 
''Openness => U, A''
 
''Openness => U, A''

Revision as of 08:52, 3 November 2021

Back to main page of D4.7 Initial Running Phase Report

2.1 Goals and pilot success criteria

Objectives and how they are satisfied in relation to success criteria

2.2 Pilot dimensions

Qualitative description on lessons learned (technical, functional, proess, data, usability etc) and preliminary conclusions on these dimensions, based on metrics, questiuonnaires and interviews? The dimensions target the scope of the piloted functionality and patterns (until delivery of the report)

2.2.1 Use

  • Overview
  • Initial feedback from focus group and real users
  • Initial results from use related metrics (logs)
  • Usefulness of DE4A patterns and components related to internal stakeholders take-up
  • Strategy on pilot use until final report

2.2.2 Value

  • Verified benefits with users and DEs / DOs
    • Contribution of pilot to DE4A benefits and to external community of SDG stakeholders
    • Pilot specific benefits

2.2.3 Learning towards Adoption

  • Approach to knowledge-building
  • Lessons learned from integration and testing useful for Adoption
  • Technical, semantic and organisational/legal knowledge provided to other WPs
  • Pilot learning for “Sustainable impact and new governance models” WP (to be agreed e.g. Sustainability recommendations, standardisation needs)
  • Lessons being learned from users (questionnaires & interviews)
  • Lessons being learned from DEs and DOs (results and outputs questionnaires & interviews)
  • Other lessons from interaction with other initiatives (SEMPER, EBSI…)

2.3 Technical common criteria (questionnaire for evaluation?)

[Qualitative description of preliminary conclusion per criterium. Explanation (in written) on how success criteria /metrics are related with Technical common criteria, distributed by pilot dimensions]

Openness => U, A

Transparency => U, V

Reusability => V, L

Technological neutrality and data portability => L

User-centricity => V

Inclusion and accessibility => U

Security and privacy => U

Administrative simplification => A, V

Effectiveness and efficiency => A, V

[Qualitative comments, and follow-up with quantitative comments on second iteration]

Next Chapter: 3. Pilot Procedures