Difference between revisions of "Conclusions and major achievements of initial iteration"
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* Collected proof of proper operation of the cross border infrastructure for authentication, authorization and evidence exchange | * Collected proof of proper operation of the cross border infrastructure for authentication, authorization and evidence exchange | ||
* Established an internationally supported evidence definition, for exchange of company-information between business registers and service providers. | * Established an internationally supported evidence definition, for exchange of company-information between business registers and service providers. | ||
| − | * Established design, architecture and assessment of infrastructure for cross border subscription and notification on company events, to be piloted in 2nd iteration | + | * Established design, architecture and assessment of infrastructure for cross border subscription and notification on company events, to be piloted in 2nd iteration |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Main lessons learned until now: | Main lessons learned until now: | ||
Revision as of 08:35, 31 January 2022
Back to Doing Business Abroad main page
Back to main page of D4.7 Initial Running Phase Report
Back to previous Chapter: 4. Pilot Procedures
[Work in progress]
Intermediate report providing preliminary conclusions.
Major achievements:
- Developed international infrastructure for cross-border exchange of company evidence by all DBA partners, by deploying and integration DE4A common components to business registers and service providers
- Developed international infrastructure for croon-border authorization and authentication but most DBA Member Status, using eIDAS pilot nodes
- Collected proof of proper operation of the cross border infrastructure for authentication, authorization and evidence exchange
- Established an internationally supported evidence definition, for exchange of company-information between business registers and service providers.
- Established design, architecture and assessment of infrastructure for cross border subscription and notification on company events, to be piloted in 2nd iteration
Main lessons learned until now:
- DE4A common components to support SDG have proven to be deployable and can be integrated to national infrastructures. Alle DBA partners managed to do so.
- Member States establish their own maximum velocity for implementing the OOP TS, and velocities differ.
- Applying a step-by-step approach for implementing the SDG infrastructure, increasing complexity gradually, has proven to aid with focus and managing the implementation.
- Establishing an implementation project on Member State level, involving necessary competent authorities and setting priority over all these authorities, will ease the implementation of the SDG in Member States.
- Member States need to establish a notified eID and eIDAS infrastructure before, or at the same time of implementing the SDG infrastructure.
Established infrastructure will be a good basis for future piloting activities (in iteration 2). The infrastructure can be extended with additional patterns and power validation mechanism (meaning there will not be a new infrastructure, but functionality wil be added to the established infrastructure).
This is a preliminary conclusion. The next deliverable (final report) will provide final conclusions, based on all executed cases with all DE/DO combinations and all patters / power validation methods that have been executed until Q3 2022. But if things are only piloted once, than these are final onclusiions. But in DBA probably limited.