Difference between revisions of "Conclusions and major achievements of initial iteration"
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[Pilot Procedures|Back to previous Chapter: 4. Pilot Procedures]] | [[Pilot Procedures|Back to previous Chapter: 4. Pilot Procedures]] | ||
− | The pilot has arrived at the starting point of actually piloting with real life participants. Pilot partners developed an international infrastructure for cross-border exchange of company evidence, by deploying and integrating DE4A common components to business registers and service providers. Also, a cross-border authorization and authentication infrastructure for piloting was established, using eIDAS pilot nodes. This infrastructure was designed, implemented and extensively tested until the point where the operation of the infrastructure was considered proven, and reliable to facilitate real-life piloting. | + | The pilot has arrived at the starting point of actually piloting with real life participants. Pilot partners developed an international infrastructure for cross-border exchange of company evidence, by deploying and integrating DE4A common components to business registers and service providers. Also, a cross-border authorization and authentication infrastructure for piloting was established, using eIDAS pilot nodes. This infrastructure was designed, implemented and extensively tested until the point where the operation of the infrastructure was considered proven, and reliable to facilitate real-life piloting. It supports the exchange of harmonized datasets about company-registrations, while the designs and assessments have been completed to extend the infrastructure for cross-border notifications about changes in company-registrations. The infrastructure established for the first iteration of the pilot, is expected to provide a good starting point for these extensions. |
− | The exercise of analyzing, developing and testing the infrastructure as well as all legal and organizational preparation | + | The exercise of analyzing, developing and testing the infrastructure as well as all legal and organizational preparation lead to the conclusion that the DE4A common components have proven to be deployable and can be integrated to national infrastructures. All DBA partners managed to do so without running into any unexpected major technical or legal difficulties. Experienced delays primarily originated in limitations caused by global events like COVID-19. |
− | + | Based on structured tests and analysis, the intermediation pattern has proven useful for the business procedures as defined in the SDG Annex 2. The need for receiving notifications about changes in business register entries was validated during analysis and design, regarding both changes in company data and company-concerned events. Analysis shows that this need cannot be fulfilled by BRIS. For the DBA pilot, a small set of events and changes has been selected for piloting, using the Subscription and Notification pattern. | |
− | Member States establish their own maximum velocity for implementing the necessary infrastructural, legal and procedural changes | + | The availability of notified eID for companies, a mandate check mechanism and eIDAS infrastructure is a prerequisite for implementing the SDG. Using eIDAS for the cross border exchange of company_IDs allows for reliable record matching at the Data Evaluator, thereby preventing unintended doublures in the Data Evaluator systems. Regarding the check on mandates of representatives, fine grained powers validation should be the ultimate goal and SEMPER specifications match the requirements for this goal. Starting with a simpler full-powers validation turns out to be a feasible and useful first step. |
+ | |||
+ | Member States establish their own maximum velocity for implementing the necessary infrastructural, legal and procedural changes. Velocities differ between Member States and establishing a national authority per Member State, supervising and prioritizing all SDG implementation activities of the involved competent authorities seems to be useful approach to organize the European implementation of the SDG. An European strategy to implement the SDG should allow for individual national timelines, while still having all Member States converge to a clear endpoint in time in order to secure progress and make sure that the solution will become available for European Citizens and companies. Applying a general step-by-step strategy for implementing the SDG infrastructure, increasing complexity gradually, has proven to help with focus and managent of the implementation. | ||
Establishing a harmonized dataset that embodies the evidence to be exchanged cross border turns out to be exhausting and time-consuming. Having the evidence match the needs of Data Evaluators and making sure that this van be provided by Data Owners requires much analysis, but is key in making the cross-border exchange of information valuable and durable. Focusing on a first limited, yet still valuable set of data increases feasibility and secures progress. | Establishing a harmonized dataset that embodies the evidence to be exchanged cross border turns out to be exhausting and time-consuming. Having the evidence match the needs of Data Evaluators and making sure that this van be provided by Data Owners requires much analysis, but is key in making the cross-border exchange of information valuable and durable. Focusing on a first limited, yet still valuable set of data increases feasibility and secures progress. |
Revision as of 10:30, 2 February 2022
Back to Doing Business Abroad main page
Back to main page of D4.7 Initial Running Phase Report
Back to previous Chapter: 4. Pilot Procedures
The pilot has arrived at the starting point of actually piloting with real life participants. Pilot partners developed an international infrastructure for cross-border exchange of company evidence, by deploying and integrating DE4A common components to business registers and service providers. Also, a cross-border authorization and authentication infrastructure for piloting was established, using eIDAS pilot nodes. This infrastructure was designed, implemented and extensively tested until the point where the operation of the infrastructure was considered proven, and reliable to facilitate real-life piloting. It supports the exchange of harmonized datasets about company-registrations, while the designs and assessments have been completed to extend the infrastructure for cross-border notifications about changes in company-registrations. The infrastructure established for the first iteration of the pilot, is expected to provide a good starting point for these extensions.
The exercise of analyzing, developing and testing the infrastructure as well as all legal and organizational preparation lead to the conclusion that the DE4A common components have proven to be deployable and can be integrated to national infrastructures. All DBA partners managed to do so without running into any unexpected major technical or legal difficulties. Experienced delays primarily originated in limitations caused by global events like COVID-19.
Based on structured tests and analysis, the intermediation pattern has proven useful for the business procedures as defined in the SDG Annex 2. The need for receiving notifications about changes in business register entries was validated during analysis and design, regarding both changes in company data and company-concerned events. Analysis shows that this need cannot be fulfilled by BRIS. For the DBA pilot, a small set of events and changes has been selected for piloting, using the Subscription and Notification pattern.
The availability of notified eID for companies, a mandate check mechanism and eIDAS infrastructure is a prerequisite for implementing the SDG. Using eIDAS for the cross border exchange of company_IDs allows for reliable record matching at the Data Evaluator, thereby preventing unintended doublures in the Data Evaluator systems. Regarding the check on mandates of representatives, fine grained powers validation should be the ultimate goal and SEMPER specifications match the requirements for this goal. Starting with a simpler full-powers validation turns out to be a feasible and useful first step.
Member States establish their own maximum velocity for implementing the necessary infrastructural, legal and procedural changes. Velocities differ between Member States and establishing a national authority per Member State, supervising and prioritizing all SDG implementation activities of the involved competent authorities seems to be useful approach to organize the European implementation of the SDG. An European strategy to implement the SDG should allow for individual national timelines, while still having all Member States converge to a clear endpoint in time in order to secure progress and make sure that the solution will become available for European Citizens and companies. Applying a general step-by-step strategy for implementing the SDG infrastructure, increasing complexity gradually, has proven to help with focus and managent of the implementation.
Establishing a harmonized dataset that embodies the evidence to be exchanged cross border turns out to be exhausting and time-consuming. Having the evidence match the needs of Data Evaluators and making sure that this van be provided by Data Owners requires much analysis, but is key in making the cross-border exchange of information valuable and durable. Focusing on a first limited, yet still valuable set of data increases feasibility and secures progress.