Difference between revisions of "Second phase"

From DE4A
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 22: Line 22:
 
Take the list of BBs from the first preliminary assessment.
 
Take the list of BBs from the first preliminary assessment.
  
Add missing BBs, i.e. BBs used by the technical WPs that or not on the list
+
Select only those BBs that where used in DE4A.
 +
 
 +
Add possible missing BBs, i.e. BBs used by the technical WPs that are not on the list.
 +
 
 +
For this set of BBs a questionnaire/survey can be completed.
  
 
==== indicators ====
 
==== indicators ====
 
+
Possible indocators for the questionnaire:
 
* interoperability (4 dimensions --> EIF/EIRA): assess interoperability of the 4 dimensions
 
* interoperability (4 dimensions --> EIF/EIRA): assess interoperability of the 4 dimensions
 
*# organizational
 
*# organizational
Line 37: Line 41:
 
# Operational
 
# Operational
  
any changes w.r.t. 1st itewration conclusions?
+
any changes w.r.t. 1st iteration conclusions?
 
* openness? CAMMS?
 
* openness? CAMMS?
 
* classification BB?
 
* classification BB?
Line 48: Line 52:
 
* easy of implementation/configuration?
 
* easy of implementation/configuration?
 
* performance of the BB?
 
* performance of the BB?
 +
* any lessons learned?
 
* any recommendations?
 
* any recommendations?
 
*  
 
*  
Line 53: Line 58:
  
 
==== questionnaire ====
 
==== questionnaire ====
for WP3,4 and 5
+
For WP3,4 and 5
  
which BB are used by which pilot, by which pattern, new BBs?
+
Which BB are used by which pilot, by which pattern, new BBs?
  
which SBB is implementing which ABB (from ref. arch.)?
+
Which SBB is implementing which ABB (from ref. arch.)?
  
provide answers for the indicators above
+
Provide answers for the indicators above.
  
 
=== When ===
 
=== When ===

Revision as of 15:27, 12 April 2022

This pages serves for preparation of the 2nd phase of the BB assessment.

Why

Learn from DE4A real world experience applying BBs.

Who

People participating in the BB assessment:

  • WP leaders/task leaders
  • Pilot leaders/architects
  • Domain experts in the different WPs

What

Assess the Solution Building Blocks (SBBs) used in DE4A Pilots.

Q include also 2nd iteration Pilots?

How

See BB 1st phase, are we doing this?

Take the list of BBs from the first preliminary assessment.

Select only those BBs that where used in DE4A.

Add possible missing BBs, i.e. BBs used by the technical WPs that are not on the list.

For this set of BBs a questionnaire/survey can be completed.

indicators

Possible indocators for the questionnaire:

  • interoperability (4 dimensions --> EIF/EIRA): assess interoperability of the 4 dimensions
    1. organizational
    2. legal
    3. semantic
    4. technical
  • maturity (dimensions?) from 1st assessment:
  1. Technical
  2. Administrative
  3. Operational

any changes w.r.t. 1st iteration conclusions?

  • openness? CAMMS?
  • classification BB?
    1. Standards and Specifications
    2. Common code or Components
    3. Building Blocks
    4. Core Service Platforms
    5. Generic Services
  • degree of meeting pilot's requirements? any gaps?
  • easy of implementation/configuration?
  • performance of the BB?
  • any lessons learned?
  • any recommendations?

questionnaire

For WP3,4 and 5

Which BB are used by which pilot, by which pattern, new BBs?

Which SBB is implementing which ABB (from ref. arch.)?

Provide answers for the indicators above.

When

TODO planning

M33 deadline of Wiki, preferably BB assessment takes place before Holidays

Envisaged output

recommendations/lessons learned

next steps:

  • plan KO/inputs