Difference between revisions of "Authorization Controller"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| pattern(s) | | pattern(s) | ||
| − | | [[Intermediation Pattern|IM]], [[USI]], [[VC]] | + | | [[Intermediation Pattern|IM]], [[User-supported Intermediation Pattern|USI]], [[Verifiable Credentials Pattern|VC]], [[Subscription and Notification Pattern|S&N]], [[Lookup Pattern|LKP]] |
| + | |- | ||
| + | |application collaboration | ||
| + | |[[Information Desk]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 26: | Line 29: | ||
! Application Service !! Description !! Pattern | ! Application Service !! Description !! Pattern | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | Authority Check |
| − | | | + | | The DP establishes that the DC can request the evidence or subscription. This service handles the lookup of authorisation. At the moment we consider the possibility for this check to be specific to the evidence type, i.e. is authority A allowed to request evidence type X, or event set. |
| − | | [[Intermediation Pattern|IM]], [[ | + | | [[Intermediation Pattern|IM]], [[Subscription and Notification Pattern|S&N,]] [[Lookup Pattern|LKP]] |
| + | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | Legal basis check |
| − | | | + | | The DC establishes for both the request and the preview whether this is allowed under applicable Union or national law in which case no user request or approval is needed. |
| − | | [[Intermediation Pattern|IM]], [[ | + | | [[Intermediation Pattern|IM]], [[User-supported Intermediation Pattern|USI]] |
| − | |||
| − | | | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
! Component!! Source !! UC !!Description | ! Component!! Source !! UC !!Description | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | todo |
| − | | | + | | description |
| [[]] | | [[]] | ||
| Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Proin suscipit mauris eu dui aliquet, feugiat porttitor eros placerat. | | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Proin suscipit mauris eu dui aliquet, feugiat porttitor eros placerat. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | |
| − | | | + | | |
| [[]] | | [[]] | ||
| − | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:42, 21 June 2021
| Item | Description |
|---|---|
| name | Authorization Controller |
| description | Application component to establish which evidence types can be exchanged between competent authorities and whether this is allowed under allowed under applicable Union or national law without user request and preview. |
| pattern(s) | IM, USI, VC, S&N, LKP |
| application collaboration | Information Desk |
| Application Service | Description | Pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Authority Check | The DP establishes that the DC can request the evidence or subscription. This service handles the lookup of authorisation. At the moment we consider the possibility for this check to be specific to the evidence type, i.e. is authority A allowed to request evidence type X, or event set. | IM, S&N, LKP |
| Legal basis check | The DC establishes for both the request and the preview whether this is allowed under applicable Union or national law in which case no user request or approval is needed. | IM, USI |
| Component | Source | UC | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| todo | description | [[]] | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Proin suscipit mauris eu dui aliquet, feugiat porttitor eros placerat. |
| [[]] |