Interdisciplinary Questions
Revision as of 09:20, 26 May 2021 by Ictu alexander.bielowski (talk | contribs)
The PSA collected 23 interdisciplinary questions as basis to provide guidance to the pilots. For each of the Reference Interaction Patterns, working hypotheses were formulated for each of the interdisciplinary questions relevant for that specific pattern. This helped to contrast the pattern and make the implications of each of them comprehensible, specifically for policy stakeholders.
[ToDo: add and update the questions from D2.4]
Multi-evidence Cases
A Multi-evidence Case is an interaction between Data Consumer and Data Provider, where the Data Consumer needs to request several pieces of evidence for a single eProcedure.
There are three distinct reasons for the Multi-evidence Case to arise.
Multiple Data Providers | Multiple Evidence Types | Multiple Evidences of the same type | Evidences for multiple subjects |
---|---|---|---|
Single Data Provider, muliple evidences of differnt type for the same subject (one user = single subject) | Single Data Provider, multiple evidence of same type for the same subject (one user = single subject) | Single Data Provider, multiple evidence of same type for different subject (one user, multiple subjects) | |
Example from Studying Abroad Pilot: A student who has multiple diplomas that can be sources from the same Data Provider. (This can be either the same University or a national diploma repository, holding diplomas from different education service providers). | Example from Moving Abroad Pilot: A family is moving abroad. In that case a parent might run a single eProcedure instance requiring evidence (e.g. place of residence) from all their family members (i.e. partner, kids, dependent). | ||